On February 6, 2025, Assembly Member Chen introduced California AB 460, a bill amending the Radiologic Technology Act to redefine "direct supervision" for radiologic technologists performing venipuncture. This legislation, currently under review as of March 19, 2025, aims to enhance flexibility in healthcare settings while maintaining patient safety. Here’s a deep dive into what AB 460 means for California’s radiology professionals and public health.
What Does AB 460 Propose?
Under the existing Radiologic Technology Act (Health and Safety Code Section 106985), certified radiologic technologists in California can perform venipuncture in an upper extremity to administer contrast materials, but only under the "direct supervision" of a licensed physician and surgeon physically present in the facility. AB 460 revises this requirement, offering two supervision options:
- Physical Presence: The physician remains on-site and immediately available to intervene.
- Remote Oversight: The physician can supervise via telephone or real-time audio communication, provided they have access to the patient’s electronic medical records (EMR) and can intervene through standing orders or protocols.
This change aims to adapt supervision rules to modern healthcare demands, leveraging technology without compromising safety. Violations of the act remain a misdemeanor, and the bill introduces a state-mandated local program due to its expanded scope.
Why This Matters for Radiologic Technologists
Radiologic technologists play a critical role in medical imaging, administering contrast materials for procedures like CT scans and MRIs. Venipuncture—inserting a needle into a vein—requires precision and training, currently including 10 hours of instruction and 10 supervised procedures. AB 460 doesn’t alter these competency standards but offers operational flexibility. By allowing remote supervision, facilities can optimize physician resources, especially in rural or understaffed areas where on-site presence may be impractical.
Impact on Patient Safety and Healthcare Delivery
The bill balances innovation with safety. The original requirement ensured a physician could act swiftly in case of adverse reactions, such as allergic responses to contrast agents. The updated definition maintains this priority by mandating immediate availability—whether in-person or via audio—with EMR access ensuring informed decision-making. Supporters argue this could:
- Improve Efficiency: Reduce scheduling delays in busy imaging centers.
- Enhance Access: Enable smaller clinics to offer services without a full-time on-site physician.
- Support Telehealth Trends: Align with California’s growing use of remote healthcare solutions.
Legal and Fiscal Context
AB 460 amends Section 106985, overriding stricter Business and Professions Code restrictions on unlicensed medical practice. It’s classified as a fiscal bill due to potential costs from misdemeanor enforcement, though it specifies no state reimbursement for local agencies, citing its redefinition of a crime under the California Constitution. This reflects a pragmatic approach to updating regulations without imposing undue financial burdens.
Training and Certification Remain Robust
The bill preserves rigorous training requirements:
- Education: 10 hours covering anatomy, puncture techniques, and emergency protocols.
- Practice: 10 venipunctures under personal supervision before certification.
- Limits: Technologists still can’t perform arterial punctures or central venous procedures beyond specified exceptions.
Facilities must document competency, ensuring radiologic technologists are well-prepared, whether supervised in-person or remotely.
What’s Next for AB 460?
As of March 19, 2025, AB 460 awaits further legislative action. Its passage could set a precedent for integrating technology into healthcare regulations, potentially influencing other states. Stakeholders—radiology professionals, healthcare administrators, and patient advocates—will watch closely to see how it balances flexibility with the patient safety standards California prioritizes.
Your Thoughts?
Could AB 460 streamline radiology services without risking patient care? Share your perspective with us, and stay updated as this bill progresses through the California Legislature.
.svg)
.png)
